Phoenix Matrix

BNIM is an architecture firm based in Kansas City with a
focus on sustainability. As their summer Graphic Design Intern, I worked on making a data visualization for their Phoenix Matrix tool. BNIM developed the Phoenix Matrix, a visualization table, as a way to calculate the cost and benefits of different building types.
View Prototype
Details
Summer 2024, 8 Weeks
BNIM
Supervisor: Beena Ramaswami
Figma, Illustrator, InDesign
Role
Main designer
Scope
Data visualization, Branding, User Design
Long story short
Challenge
BNIM wants an easy-to-read visual of the climate impact of building four different types of architecture to present to clients and investors.
Constraints
Follow brand guidelines and design is applicable to print and web.
Solution
A grid-based data visualization that matches the structure of the original data set and an interacting web prototype.
Research
What is the Phoenix Matrix?
The Phoenix Matrix is a series of calculations of the cost and benefits of constructing four different sustainability building types. The types include Business as Usual (regular building), LEED Platinum, Zero Energy and Water, and Regenerative Building. The climate impact covers the three environmental scopes of architecture.
What are the scopes?
Scope 1: Direct emissions: Energy Demand, Energy Recharge, and Net Energy
The three units have an additive relationship: Energy Demand + Energy Recharge = Net Energy.

Scope 2: Indirect emissions Energy Grid Demand and Pollution

Scope 3: Water usage and construction emissions
Brainstorm sketches
Scope 1:

To convey the additive relationship of the three, I use a lightning symbol to correlate the three different statistics. I also use green and orange to convey the negative values (good for climate) and positive values (bad for environment)
Scope 2:

Since the rest of the scopes don’t have a direct relationship within the values, I focused on trying new and innovative ways to create representations of the design
Scope 3:

Water demand has a multitude of individual sections of types of water needed by a building

Brainstorming different ways of showing the relationship of water icons without compromising neatness and visibility

Design

Drafting
The original Phoenix Matrix is set up as a graph so my first iteration of the design reflected the graph-like nature of the matrix. With my own designed icons and representing positive and negative values using the BNIM color palette, I created a to-scale graph of the matrix. I developed new personalized icons for each of the data points.
Feedback
My supervisor approve of the grid format. My icons, on the other hand, needed to be more aligned and alike for all of the categories.
Elevating data presentation
I prototyped the web version of the Phoenix Matrix in the last week of my internship. I believed that the interaction of the page helps highlight the data in a way the grid format can't. By breaking out of the strict grid of the print version, the web version presents the data dynamically.

Insights

Key takeaways
My supervisors and I are satisfied with the second version due to the flexibility and interactiveness of the design. The intense idealization process laid the groundwork for the designs. It was hard, frustrating, but ultimately rewarding.
Challenges
The greatest challenge I face was accessibility. The Director of Sustainability at BNIM was one of my supervisors as well. He is one of the writers of the original Phoenix Matrix and he is red-green color blind. This is the first time I’m learning to accommodate and receiving feedback from a color-blind user in real time. It instilled in me a design habit to think about accessibility while iterating.

©2025. All rights reserved.